It is Internet posting from unpaid writers. No need to threaten a guy. I laughed at his post because there are good points to it. The one catch is the problem of the Left catching on and then applying the pressure of the entire security state on you with the added cover of it being against Muslim terrorist threats. If it is solely joining a unit of the coalition of victims and the fringes, it might get bad if the coalition frays and starts an all on all war. When one is facing a totalitarian and powerful adversary, one has to think in odd ways not just to fight but to survive. This is not just surviving the USSR like Solzhenitsyn did because the Western Left has added 3rd world invasion to the mix. The future is very murky.
No need to threaten the guy. I know what my simple "Russian Amerikanskiy Zones" post inspired in some for a reaction, and that was, like Spandrell's post, an "exit" strategy. No need to threaten him because some of us joked on twitter about this a year or so ago. Could we convert to Sunni and make a sect within like the Sufis that reveres Jesus? have some fun with it? There are lapsed Muslims and bad Muslims, c'mon, they drink in France. I have seen them drink here. It's a troll to survive.
Spandrell should not get threats. It's Internet posting so click another link, turn your head, look the other way, turn the screen off. Don't tell me some of you have not weighed the "leave the US before it gets horrendous or stay and fight" pros and cons. I know you have. I have messaged with you. It is quite the debate. I think we get a fight in the 2020s. In the 2020s, there will be blood.
I'll defend Spandrell but not Jim's post "Women Like Rapists". As one of the last NRx people on twitter and with an active blog, I get notes from readers. Some people had asked me last week what the fuck is wrong with Jim, and I don't think there is anything wrong with him. Jim is a good thinker and has a unique style. Everyone has good and bad quirks, but I would not waste time defending his post. It's not my job. Go to his comments section and debate with him.
In the post, Jim takes evolutionary psychology to the nth degree and combines it with some Swedish feminists angrily saying we're not "your women" to Swedish men discussing protecting "our women". Oh man, that means the Swedish women want the Muslim rapists! What autism!
Commenters on Jim's own blog note the 500+ police reports in Cologne alone, the cries for help on TV on Internet videos and other items that maybe make this bigger than that. Jim's looking at a sliver of the issue, and this entire Islamic Invasion is way bigger than just that. How much of the kneejerk pro-migrant reaction is decades of accept the others programming? How much of this is Stockholm Syndrome? It might also politically be feminists taking any chance to proclaim their grrl power womynhood like the slutwalks and also defend the idiotic policies of the party they support. Swedish feminists might be the West's worst, too. If anything, this is a wonderful example of how the political team allegiance mind virus has so twisted feminists that they cannot see their coming deaths from stonings and honor killings. Even gays are saying we should accept the Muslims, and they will be tossed off roofs in a EU Caliphate.
But hey, Jim wrote "Women Like Rapists". Seems like hyperbole for an attention grabbing title. I don't know. What I do know is women fantasizing about rough sex and even rape in women's erotica (think any Ayn Rand written sex scene) is not like having 8 drunk Arabs beat and gang rape a 50 year old, a 21 year old or even a 10 year old. Apples and fucking oranges.
Jim has a point that the lotus eater euro men have to step up, and that patriarchy should be recognized because it is either coming back with euros in the lead or Muslims (but as Spandrell wrote, maybe Euro-Muslims). As part of "my team", I will defend Jim from baseless accusations, but not this post. Jim has many great points in many different essays, including the essays right before and after the discussed one. This one seems myopic in view.
It's okay if I am the only person in my crowd who disagrees with that post, but fuck it, it's just Internet posting.
If interested, the MPC thread on the Dark Enlightenment is something I check every few weeks or so to see if there is constructive criticism. It has declined in quality and switched from criticism, debate and playful teasing of Foseti, Moldbug and Dark Enlightenment ideas to simply mocking the latest post from pedo.Jim (MPC's nickname for him).