Looks like our elite paymasters are doing everything in their power to get a fresh, new wave of unwanted immigration rammed down Americans' throats. This happens to be timed roughly at the same time that a bombshell is dropped, confirming that the NSA is collecting all of our telecommunications data. The outrage over this seems to be disproportionately from Americans who are white, independent of government assistance and younger. Opinion polls, Faceborg, and even twitter can reinforce that composite image, as the NSA couldn't compete with "Love and Hip Hop" for Twitter trends. Liberal media propaganda does work, but it is not nearly as effective as it used to be. Because the media has lost its effectiveness and the old socialist message was a loser to many white voters, the government decided to import a new people to further their economic control.
Right after the second World War, Americans were obsessed with cutting the budget deficit. Keynes' elixir had worked on the elites but hadn't sunk in with Joe Six Pack. The '50s newspaper propaganda did everything to try to change this. Most of our literature, dominant form of exchanging ideas then, pushed the increase in government expenditures. Captain Capitalism has a great post on this phenomenon of rising government share of GDP. He's right. What is also right is that this was a propaganda effort to convince people that the government programs were needed and beneficial. Sadly, there were no alternative media outlets that could point out the hypocrisy on display. In the very same newspapers blasting headlines about bad schools and poor government goods, you had advertisements for all of the post-war consumer and durable goods. On the same page were ads to make life a dream while a reporter was telling you how America was falling apart and falling behind. This was a lie.
It was a lie with a purpose. The purpose was to get people to shift more money to public goods and away from private goods. This was the liberal government dream of having more of the economy under government control and influence. Americans couldn't be forced into Communism when fighting against the USSR in a Cold War. They had to be manipulated into believing public investments and government control of the economy was needed. This was a steady message in the post-war period. Check Google's Ngram for phrases like 'government spending needed', 'bad schools', 'public investment', 'invest in schools' and other public expenditure garbage. This suffered a setback as the right figured out how to latch onto the free market Milton Friedman ideas and the left's '68 takeover scared America away from them for years at the polls. Once enough white Americans rejected that and bought into greed is good (initiative), the powers that be needed to elect a new people.
Importing people from socialist countries, importing people who become government welfare cases, importing people from Leninist states (Mexico), importing people who may score lower on average on IQ tests all cater to a party that feeds off government patronage power. It also is putty in the hands of those who control our media messaging system. I can look through the NY Times presidential endorsements of the 20th century and laugh if I want or just assume the default 21st century journalism setting is leftist, corporate scumbag. Who is easier to trick, Average Joe or Dumber than Average Joe? Who is easier to get attached to you, a person who depends on you for living in the USA or a multi-generation born citizen? Who won't care about you reading their texts if you give them a free phone? Who is likely to confuse government goodies with the government protecting your rights? The left needs more dependents to trick to get a higher share of the economy under their thumb. They need to divert more income from the economic exchange loop through their highly inefficient government system. They need more fools.