Tuesday, July 28, 2015

What's Soros Doing This Month?

It is fun to mock sites like Salon and Slate for their silly beats they cover. The pop culture beats are terrible wastes of resources. There is the Kardashian beat, the paparazzi beat, and the ever popular "Jon Stewart Style Derisive Comedy" beat. Could they redirect those resources to cover some other public figure? Tackling someone who has hands in multiple jars, lips at the ears of many world leaders, and money spent on everything legal and illegal one could politically imagine would be a great beat. Maybe it would earn a Pulitzer. What would a George Soros beat look like?

Is Soros taking down Greece? Could it be, might it be... yes, he is. George Soros goes after the Greeks. This is why you buy powerful governments, so you can then engage in big lending with foreign, sovereign borrowers. You keep the lending going and like a morphine drip, they get addicted. Then the threat of pulling it gets played. Either the foreign sovereign ponies up the money or they scream they can't and then bailouts happen, which really just end up in your pocket not the foreigners. Greeks got a new deal. Look at the fine print. Clause 7 makes default virtually impossible, clause 9 allows the advancement of neoliberalist globalization to the business activities of Greece, and clause 10 cites privatization of assets. Wonder who will be buying those assets for pennies on the dollar?

Soros is everywhere with his money pouring into foundations and charities that meddle in foreign nations. The Russians are onto this game, and may be taking steps to push old George and his minions out. Smart move to remove foreign elements unaligned with the ruling power or broader society. What right do they have there? They are located in Russia on the whim of Russia's security and bureacracy systems. Hungary is onto the NGO game as well, so if you are a do-gooder prog in college, stop learning Eastern European languages. Soros will re-assign you to Sub-Sahara Africa. You can teach them about female empowerment and gay rights. Good luck surviving. Take note any of you who dream of secession. You cannot just leave, but you must remove root and branch the posionous elements of progressive power.

It must be root and branch since Soros has his tentacles everywhere, especially in America's heartland. Who else is going to tell Americans that #BlackLivesMatter? Soros is backing an anti-death penalty drive in Nebraska. Tsk-tsk, the death penalty is barbaric and bad, so no way should a small state bring it back if it sees fit. Soros' worldview must prevail. I think allowing protestors to turn into rioters and telling police to stand down is barbaric and bad. Where is my foundation to fund #SafeCitiesMatter? When you allow democracy to set up shop, you allow money from anywhere into the process. I can dream of pan-secession and competing states, but I would look for a state that bans any NGO. A man like Soros would never rest with many more targets to change. Just look at all the work to be done in big, bad America by his Open Society foundation.

This might be too much to lay at the feet of one man. After all, the Ford Foundation started by Henry Ford eventually became a CIA front, channeling money to Harvard, non-profits, research institutes and everything to advance the Anglo communist agenda. This is why the Soros beat would be a great endeavor. What other entities or billionaire patrons are sending money into Soros' non-profits to push public opinion one way or the other? How many media members are complicit in suppressing this information? For an industry claiming to want to speak truth to power, the media finds a way to dodge old Georgie's dabbling whenever they can.

Monday, July 27, 2015

Everette Lee DeGolyer + Modern Convenience

There is much that we take for granted. One I like is refrigeration. That is an interesting example of Eruopean ingenuity plus many industrial pieces that fit together to make something everyone uses and our current population numbers depend on work. It is also a thing white people put together in their spare time to improve the world. Get rid of whitey and you'll get rid of some of the goodies you enjoy. At the base of everything is energy. A man virtually no one has heard of but all owe something to is Everette Lee DeGolyer.

I have written before on the legit excuse that we cannot discus every single person and every single contributor in the world. It is a silly exclamation for progressives to cry marginalization. I wrote how Charles Kettering invented many things that make the modern world go, but who could name him? Yet, progressives and their poor, put down pets want you to feel ashamed you do not know some random reporter or mathematician's assistant that happens to be part of the rainbow coalition. Everette Lee DeGolyer allowed oil and gas exploration to take the next step in development and put seven billion mostly useless people on the planet. Few know of him and his feats.

DeGolyer was a geophysicist who brought the science of seismology to oil exploration. He did not invent the techniques, which were developed by two other white guys, but he applied them to oil resources and in ways that yielded oil so steadily that no one denied its value. He discovered the Portrero del Llano 4 well, which kicked Mexican oil development into high gear. His efforts focused on applying seismography to oil exploration. His mind worked on finance as well, as he started the concept of independent, scientificappraising of oil reserve estimates so that investors could pour money into oil firms, bringing oil to you. In his spare time, he started the technology firm that became Texas Instruments.

DeGolyer was also the missionary or pioneer who figured out the oil value in the Middle East. While the US produced 90% of the Allies' oil in WW2, DeGolyer was adamant that the future of supply was in Arabian sands and waters of the Persian Gulf. DeGolyer and his brethren pulled oil out of the rocks and at flow rates that made development of even marginal resources possible. We drill for oil now miles under the ocean surface and thousands of feet under the ocean floor. It goes back to Degolyer.

You think modern medicine is what it is without that marginal oil production and padded EROEI from work originated by DeGolyer and other technical experts? Does food production reach its amazing productivity levels without oil? No. It is a slower growth world, maybe even a world of actual famines in Africa that destroy the population rather than the famines that somehow created higher populations in African nations after they started than before. Do suburbs and exurbs grow out, expanding our population reach and putting off resolving our social policy dysfunction? No.

Looking at it this way, oil, similar to fiat money, puts off dealing with hell and horror and selection pressures by making everything easier. Mr. Land calls it the Malthusian Suppression Machine, but our modern world of technology built on European civilization keeps the horror at bay. Just look at the historical population graph for Rome. Something unusual? Oil keeps the tough questions of who should be around in a generation or two at bay. Some on the Left will chant to get rid of whitey, but if the likes of Mr. DeGolyer are tossed out of the lifeboat, who will keep it afloat?

Sunday, July 26, 2015

Social Matter - Hidden History: Oil Won WW2

A new entry for the "Hidden History" series is an essay on what won WW2 for the Allies. Go read it at Socal Matter!

Does World War II come down to waves of Russian men? Is it American economic and farm output? Is it code breaking? How about technology like radar and the bomb? There is always talk of what won the war, and one gigantic element is usually left out: oil. Allied oil production advantages set the situation in their favor and provided troops with an insurmountable edge. Oil even started the war, but regardless of how it began, oil would settle the war.

Read the rest of it there.

Friday, July 24, 2015

Last Week's Social Matter + Preview for This Week's 9

First, a note on the cuckservative phenomenon. Hilarious. It is rustling the jimmies. There is a distinct difference between conservakin and cuckservative. Just this morning I noted Dana Loesch is a conservakin while Megan "Fats" McCain is a cuckservative. Look at their stated beliefs. Conservakin don't know "the game". They don't get that it is rigged. They are your little people and voters for the GOP. A bunch are the types who are responding to Trump's message. Cuckservatives are far more devious and the thought leaders of the false opposition GOP. If a conservakin knew the full truth, they'd be enraged. You were probably conservakin once. Cuckservatives know the game, and play along for a comfy lifestyle and job. Cuckservatives understand the immigration game and push the "need for Hispanic engagement" meme. Why? Well, they run a political consultancy firm that will solve that problem for you. They are disgusting and deserve ridicule.

Last week, I wrote about the DC help to the Sinaloa Cartel. This week I am writing a "Hidden History" piece on what won WW2 for the Allies.

-----------------------------------------------

It is amazing what happens when one high profile American decides to make something an issue. Donald Trump’s use of illegal immigration as a central talking point in the presidential campaign carnival allowed for a bit more focus on the prison escape of arrested Sinaloa cartel kingpin “El Chapo“. Corruption became a discussed feature for a moment, and then was dropped. The focus was on Mexican corruption, but a deeper evaluation of the Sinaloas would force Americans to review America’s dirty dealings with the Sinaloa cartel.

There is an old political concept of “money honest” and then dirty politicians. Money honest meant that a politician would not take a direct bribe for a government contract, but if you placed business with his private business, he would make sure government contracts came your way. This is the basics of the Clinton Foundation corruption scheme. They take in money for their foundation, magically your business or policy desires get shepherded through the system, and the Clintons can claim there was no bribery involved. What the American government has going on with the Sinaloas looks to be a similar situation.

The Sinaloas is the cartel that dominates the American drug market. They hold 80% of the meth market, and operate in thousands of American cities. They have set up shop in Chicago as the American hub for their distribution. The Sinaloa cartel controls the heroin trade routes, and dominates the heroin market. The spike in heroin and meth supply is supposedly due to the decriminalization of marijuana, which has just happened in three states. This makes little sense, as the rise in supply started before Colorado’s referendum, and marijuana is widely used across the U.S. The meth spike is due to the American crackdown on domestic producers that started over a decade ago. Heroin’s spike is most likely due to the rise in opiate demand. Drugs are a two-way street, so America’s empty, atomized citizens clamor for a high, and they are finding escape with products provided by the Sinaloas. Mexican gangsters should be easy to spot in America.

They are not. America is now 17% Hispanic. There are 40 million Americans of Mexican descent living in the lower 48. Sam Quinones’ book Dreamland illustrates how Mexican immigration has allowed a setting in white bread America that makes it easier for Mexican drug gangs to operate. Drug dealers find it much easier to blend in when Americans see similar guys working the the “blow and mow” crews on business park grounds. This is when the Sinaloas are not spreading their product directly to urban black gangs that our cities fail to address from a criminal or social standpoint. In NY Times Magazine’s long profile on the cartel, the Sinaloas come off as a business that buys everyone they can, tries to avoid bloodshed, and even grows marijuana in far northern America (Wisconsin). This is only possible with lax immigration enforcement and a porous border.

It gets worse, though, since the NY Times profile missed some opportunities for follow up. Other reporters have looked at how Fast and Furious was most likely a secret deal between the Sinaloas and the DEA. This is arming narcoterrorists that operate in a nation that international watchdogs and geopolitical pundits consider a borderline failed state. Business Insider confirmed that these deals and even worse went on for, roughly, the last 15 years. BI made sure to say it was not proof the U.S. government supported them, but in putting the pieces together, it makes sense. American forces also helped nabbed the head of Los Zetas, who were a rival to the Sinaloas and far more violent cartel in general. The closer one looks, the more it appears the American government picked a winner in the cartel wars.

One of the theories was that “picking” the Sinaloas would allow for less violence, a more stable Mexico, and a safer border. Those are all failures and poor excuses. Cartel violence continues to rage in Mexico. Mexico never cleans up its act because they can simply push problems northward. Up north, there seems to be a government willing to help the Sinaloas. America does not directly help the Sinaloas, but besides the gun deals and informing, look at the details of how federal policy at the border helps the cartel smuggle drugs. Border patrols and agents are criticized for shootings and are hamstrung in who they can investigate or what they can do. Senator Jeff Sessions released a painstakingly detailed timeline of the federal government’s policies, procedures and executive orders under President Obama that have created our southern border nightmare.

This is nothing new, as terrible federal decisions like the ’86 Amnesty, the 1996 Bill Clinton “Oh No the Peasants are Noticing” immigration law that was never enforced, and President Bush’s lax border security, despite a huge expansion of homeland security in the name of terrorism, all contributed to this meaningless border. Add to all of this the idea of no border fence of any sort and minimal container screening, and it is a recipe for moving product. El Chapo dug a tunnel under the border to smuggle drugs, which was a game changer for smuggling but just the latest innovation on the fake border.

From a bigger picture perspective, America sends planes, attack helicopters, and thousands of troops to any Middle East flare up, yet cannot be bothered to secure the border. Our border cities, like Laredo, Texas, have become crime-infested, glorified refugee camps for Mexicans escaping cartel violence. This border issue is not a local governance problem, but a federally created monster. Federally created, not something Obama created on his own, because this is the result of our permanent government, that is, agencies aligning with large corporate interests to flood America with more and more workers to increase profits, as well as more and more government resource consumers and users to feed the bureaucratic monster.

Very few people are saying D.C. is in bed with the Sinaloas. Reputable media outlets say the American government is not in bed with the Sinaloas. If there is an out for the Feds, it is the “money honest” concept. The Feds are not giving the Sinaloas guns to help them – wait, they are. The Feds are not moving the drugs for them, but they do restrict border agents, do not inspect all large containers, and never secure the border. The Feds are not setting up the Sinaloas in cities, but they have poorly enforced all immigration laws in order to flood our cities with Little Mexicos for easier cover.

The Sinaloas just have bought everyone in Mexico; it couldn’t possibly happen here. Like a “money honest” politician, the Feds are not working with the Sinaloas per se. The Feds just create the perfect working environment for Sinaloan ground teams, the perfect Swiss cheese border for Sinaloan smugglers, in addition to arresting the competition’s leaders and selling the Sinaloas guns.

Thursday, July 23, 2015

WW1 A Man And His Horse

 
They did a WW1 movie about a guy and his horse a few years back. It is pretty sad when the only thing Hollywood thinks they can turn into a great drama about the first World War is a man's bond with his horse. That is SWPL catnip. Forget the bond of brothers in the trenches. Forget the survivor guilt for what must have felt like cosmic chance of surviving a gas attack compared to the guy next to you. A man's connection to an animal sells! This sort of makes sense though. The average SWPL would lose their mind over someone leaving a dog in a parked car in the sun but overlook abortion. SWPLs skew towards the vegetarian and vegan bent on ethical grounds but have most likely defending Planned Parenthood's baby body parts delivery service.

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Why The NY Mag Open Marriage Article Sounds Fake

Making the rounds since it was dropped by our media elite overlords has been one man's tale of being a super feminist by letting his wife screw other guys. It is being laughed at, mocked, given the dismissive wanking hand gesture and been skewered by others. I see this as a nice propaganda piece to push the very idea I wrote would be next quest for the progressive steamroller: polygamy, open marriages, breaking down the one man-one woman foundation for society.

I'm not going to joke on the article. I'm going to point out that this appears fake. This is in NY Magazine, a pretty prestigious platform. Note the author Michael Sonmore returns nothing on Google, has no LinkedIn, no other hits but this one article. Either NY Mag is printing a known author under a pseudo or they are crafting a fictional story to push a desired social goal. Strategically, this is to push poly on married people who read NY Mag, those who say they read Ny Mag and people who want to be like those who say they read NY Mag. Most normal human beings will scoff and mock this story, and Amerikaners wont even read it, but stupid SWPL types will. Even more specific, who reads stupid "Lifestyle" essays? This is to push it on SWPL married women. Remember the prog goal: break the nuclear family, push decisions and norm enforcement to the tribe, break down tribe identities except for the big government approved tribe.

This focus on ladies explains the details. The details are very female focused and friendly, and the key is the supposedly male narrator. Here is the feminist or female friendly poly fantasy. Pick up on key pieces of the story.

  • The wife brings the idea up.
  • The couple talks and talks and talks about it.
  • The husband is open to it and agrees.
  • The male writer recycles the old canard that his wife is hitting her sexual prime in mid-30s (ha).
  • She is a mother of two (a 6 and a 3 year old).
  • They have done this for two years.
  • The husband has flings but not as many as her.
  • He wants to hear her hot sex stories.
  • One of her first flings fell in love with her
  • Her new fling is Paulo.
Review the above. This is a win-win for all involved. This mid-30s mother of two isn't schlepping for sex with an older man, but a guy with a name that connotes exotic, Latin lover. This flies in the face of the experience your divorced or single female friends in their mid-30s are having. Wait, hold on, they have been doing this for two years and she has a 3 year old. So this woman brought up an open marriage with a 1 year old? Hahahahahahahaha. Her husband approves, he's getting his freak on too, and he is supportive and even wants to hear the lurid details. In the beginning a man fell hard in love for the wife, she tried to reciprocate and it became a mess... yet the married couple stayed together and did not end the experiment. Ladies, you too can easily find sex and even have new guys fall for you if you just move to an open marriage! Like the overdrive push on gays and trans, it is not tolerance or acceptance but approval and encouragement. We all want to have our vices approved, then they no longer are vices and we'll no longer feel any tiny tickle of shame or guilt.

This feels like a fake. It is reminiscent of the divorced mom using online dating to snatch a millionaire carpenter that Dalrock exposed. Without names, it is hard to believe. The unknown pen name in a major media platform reminds me of another pseudonym to push an agenda that felt a little off. A couple of years ago a writer named "Isaac Abel" was published in both the Atlantic and Salon. Really deep stuff like "porn addiction", "porn addiction making him a bad boyfriend" and "his one gay experience". It was admitted that Isaac Abel was a pseudonym. I'm just an anonymous blogger myself, but Isaac Abel sounded an awful lot like Ona Abelis.

Isaac Abel was a sex writer who lived in Brooklyn. Ona Abelis is a writer, sometimes on sex and relationships, who lived in Brooklyn. If you run samples of their writing through writing comparison tools, they have some striking similarities. There is no proof they are the same person, but by golly, shucks, the overlap is interesting. Abel's essay's messages are pretty straightforward: porn warped my mind and then later I had a gay night. The gay essay reads like bullshit you'd find on literotica or Tumblr where a young woman ships Indiana Jones with Harry Potter (these people exist). SWPLs read these media entities, so it pushes some prog friendly ideas chief being gay experimentation should be fine for all.

Swingers and cuck fetish couples exist. Hell, NFL coach Rex Ryan and his wife are swingers. It is also a small crowd that should not be pushed on the margins even if it is for the deluded yet high status NY Mag reading crowd. This is pretty nefarious that the media will use fiction, pseudos and possibly women writing as men to send a message. In all propaganda, the messanger counts just as much as the medium and the message itself. It is partly why our diverse society has a hard time with puppet leaders speaking because the speaker "doesn't look like me, doesn't get me". Advertisers are movign away from using human models in photos and videos due to this problem. The speaker or writer matters. This is why the media drags out Harvard kids from Texas to write of the climate of hate in Texas when Oswald shot JFK or Obama the Harvard student was used to counter the Bell Curve. These sex articles are supposedly by men to tell you that the latest deviancy that goes against long standing historical standard heterosexual male norms, mores and traditions are really cool. A man said so.

Monday, July 20, 2015

Ashley Madison does Escape (the Piña Colada Song)

In honor of the Ashley Madison hack, I reworked the lyrics to "Escape (the Piña Colada Song)" to fit our modern times.....

I was tired of my lady, we'd been together too long
Like a bookmarked porno scene set to a techno song
So while she lay there sleepin' I surfed the web in bed
In the Ashley Madison personals, there was this profile I read

If you like piña coladas and getting caught in the rain
If you're not into yoga, if you have half a brain
If you like having rough sex at midnight, in the dunes of the cape
Then I'm the dirty girl you've looked for, DM me and escape

I didn't think about my lady, but fuck her, she's kind of mean
See me and my old lady had fallen into the same old dull routine
So I messaged the profile, typed out on my pricey Ipad
And though I'm nobody's poet, I thought it wasn't half bad

Yes, I like piña coladas and sex til you scream my name
I'm a CrossFit lifting dude, I am into champagne
I've got to meet you by tomorrow noon and for S&M, bring duct tape
At a bar called O'Malley's where we'll plan our escape

So I waited with high hopes and she showed up in black leather pants
I knew the Botox smile in an instant, I knew the curve of her implants
It was my own lovely lady and she said, "Aw, it's you."
Then we laughed for a moment and I said, "I never knew."

That you like piña coladas and gettin' slapped in the face
And the feel of the ocean and the pleasure laccccccced with pain
So you like getting assfucked in the dunes on the cape
You're the whore that I've looked for, come with me and escape


Let's get this on a demo. Weimerica would eat it up.

Annex Mexico And Get It Over With

The greatest thing about the Trump candidacy is that he is merely speaking truths about immigration through our porous border that normal Americans have thought or said for decades, bringing them out in the open. The second greatest thing is the weird situation that Keynesians like Paul Krugman, who get hard ons for any public works project, are not supportive of his "Build Da Wall" project. While I support Trump's immigration restrictionist ideas, let's give the left some play. In fact, let's take the left's idea to a logical conclusion. Let's annex Mexico.

I am not the first to suggest this in tongue in cheek fashion. Read Erik Rush's book, which is a quick read of 100 pages or so. The statistics in his book are staggering, and yes, it is an invasion aided and abetted by the elite of both nations. Rush has a RationalWiki entry that is so critical that I like the guy without knowing anything else about him. Mexico is a borderline failed state that without the pressure release valve called America would have to deal with its problems. This has nothing to do with starvation (they are fatter than us) or misery (happiest nation on Earth). This is just the humane way to handle a situation where 40 million Mexicans live in America (Mexico population is 122 mil), with a large quantity of them living along the border and sending remittances back, propping up the Mexican economy. This also would be America embracing the reality that it is an empire and changing administration of its empire.

America would have a much smaller border to defend to the south of Mexico, and it would change how it administers its immigration problem to account for the 122 million new Americans. America could call for a stop to all legal immigration for a decade generation as it assimilates, integrates and figures out how to handle the Mexicans. There are benefits, and not just resolving the border issue. The Marxist loser Mexican academics would be defanged, Mexico would suddenly have American administration and Mexico would have a boost of infrastructure projects to build up its nation. Imagine the ecological improvement by sending SWPL teams down to collect the plastic bags (the Mexican national flower) south of the Rio Grande.

The other change this would have to bring is a change in how America administers its regions. This would create a need to maintain economic consistency yet allow for provincial administration on a social level. Money is all that holds America's disparate regions together, so we could go full throttle on this and respect regional differencs while maintaining the economic beliefs of our 1%. I know this won't happen, but giving up on the forced universalism would benefit everyone. Provincial autonomy would calm everyone down. There are even bigger rewards.

On Social matter yesterday, I wrote about the DC-Sinaloa Cartel connection. There is a two prong way to dismantle the cartel's violent side. First would be mass legalization of drugs. You might think this will lead to armageddon, but no, just look at Portugal's experience with legalization for a possible roadmap. Legalization would drop the price and legitimize the cartel producers and turn them into another arm of our "just enough good stuff to use but not enough to kill you" vice products like booze and smokes. Heroin won't be how they hook you, but an opium gum that acts like Nicorette will take the edge off the long work day. Cocaine is a helluva drug, but a vape coke smoke session will help you hit the clubs. You think American manufacturing, industrialization and ingenuity isn't going to find a way to bring cocaine, opiates and weed to Americans in a safe manner? What do you think "oxy" is?

There is a second way annexing Mexico helps fight the cartels is even if you do not go the legalization route. By becoming a province of America, there becomes an arm of federal agents that represent a separate power structure, separate network of authority and separate culture of administration to fight the corruption issue. Yes, American agents can become corrupt, just look at the federal Bitcoin bandits. Strict enforcement of corruption (death if you take bribes), solid pay and unrelenting viciousness towards violent cartel members will work. This is a separate system outside the current system that will be backed up by guns and American wealth. Drones take an entire infrastructure of agents and spotters, but a military not in the cartels' pockets might be effective at stopping the violence. Hopefully, legalization would fix this like ending prohibition started the dismantling of American mobs.

This is all a thought experiment, and one that is a partly comedic, but let's talk about a very possible future for America. Yes, Brazil Norte is bandied about (here on this blog) for those who believe in slower decline, Leftist singularity is mentioned by guys with eyes on revolutions, and a US break-up is dreamed by some of us. There is a brilliant troll amongst us (he's even trolled some of #NRX) who proposes the "White Hispanics in Confederate Grey" scenario. It is similar to Brazil Norte but different.

White Hispanics in Confederate Grey

Say the economic day of reckoning comes for the dollar and living standards go through a sudden drop. How many SWPLs stay? Some, possibly many, will leave. Can't you see the Boomers who have enabled their kids tons giving them some scratch to emigrate to Canada, New Zealand, the southern cone of Souh America or even Europe? Hell, the Boomers will retire to the third world to make their meager retirement savings go further rather than change their dumbass lifestyle. This goes for Jews too who will probably high tail it to Israel as Israel hunkers down and possibly changes their patron to remain viable. Before we go further, have you looked at fertility rates?

There is a reason I write that liberals only see Hispanics for their wombs. They need them. That black number is 2.0, but then you have the problem of infanticide and the number that die before they hit 25. Within the white numbers is a split between the very fertile Amerikaner class (great Moldbugism) and the infertile SWPL class. Have you see data on interracial marriage? For all the talk, the interracial marriage numbers are tiny if you don't consider Hispanics a race. When you do, the numbers are noticeable. Maybe you've worked with white guys in the Southwest who tell you that their Hispanic daughter is the whitest acting Hispanic girl you'd ever meet. Then you meet her and have it confirmed until you meet the next one. Not every white married to a Hispanic is Jeb Bush.


If you extrapolate numbers out, looks to me like Hispanics and Amerikaners are your growth populations and your prime intermarriage pairing. They also are not your types to abandon America for New Zealand if the dollar tanks. They also like their groups' history. If America gets knocked down a peg economically, government services get cut back and futures look dim, the SWPLs will bail for cafes in foreign lands like a new Lost Generation (cosplay opportunity).

Who is left? Good old, prole Amerikaners and Hispanics who have been melding slowly in certain spots. Do either of those groups like blacks? No. I bet the day of reckoning for blacks would come with semi-organized violence against the dindu class. What whites would be left to cover for the dindus in the media or and non-security institutions? The assimilated black class suddenly loses their patrons (SWPL whites and Jews), and makes nice to the new order. This is a fusion Amerikaner-Hispanic order. That order is White Hispanics in Confederate Grey. Finally, America will fulfill the European held stereotype of a nation of truck driving, gun loving machismo motherfuckers. I will take it over Brazil Norte or a Leftist Singularity.

In all seriousness, the current immigration system does not work. Just securing the border would be one step. The next is handling idiots like the ebola Liberian guy better, as in physically removing and barring them from entry ever again. What was he doing here in the first place? Why do we have H1B visas when we're in a stagnant era? Why are we letting in anyone not a millionaire when we have roughly 50 million Americans on food stamps? Why did we increase our Muslim intake after 9/11? These are all great questions on their own, and they will only get worse as the economy does not have a lift off. If the feds will do nothing about immigration and watch as thousands stream in by the day, drop the pretense and annex Mexico now.